NEW New York/London (Reuters) The report says that Global M&A shrank for the third straight quarter due to rising interest rates that made lenders rethink their plans from financing big deals, and the dollar’s soaring did little to encourage U.S. companies into snapping up foreign targets despite the ongoing geopolitical tensions.
A dramatic drop in the number of large private equity buyouts has contributed to the decline in dealmaking across the globe as third-quarter activity dropped 54 percent to $716.62 billion, down from $1.56 trillion during the same time frame in the previous year, as per Dealogic statistics.
Dealmakers are being challenged when pitching deals to clients, as the annual volume has so far decreased by 33%, with $2.97 trillion worth of deals announced this year.
“The backup in the leveraged finance market along with the lengthened timeline of regulatory reviews for many transactions has had an impact on dealmaking,” said Cary Kochman, global co-head of M&A at Citigroup Inc. (NYSE:C).
M&A volume within the United States plunged by nearly 63 percent in the third quarter, to $255.89 billion, as the increasing cost of borrowing forced companies to put off their plans for transformational buyouts.
Inflation is escalating, European M&A activity suffered an increase of 42% in the third quarter, while Asia-Pacific declined by 52%, as per Dealogic.
“In today’s markets, most banks don’t feel comfortable underwriting a financing package of 3 to 4 billion euros for a private equity deal in Europe,” said Guillermo Baygual, co-head of EMEA M&A at JPMorgan (NYSE:JPM).
“Getting deals done takes much longer. The focus is purely on high-quality assets, especially in resilient industries such as infrastructure,” said the CEO. stated.
Wall Street banks had to accept a loss of approximately $700 million resulting from an underwriting issue for Citrix’s $16.5 billion leveraged purchase of Citrix.
The environment for making deals has been shaky this year several corporate buyers have decided to abandon previous handshake agreements, while others have put off big buyouts completely.
“I don’t think we’ve hit the bottom yet. Today’s market is just all over the place and people are still a little bit spooked,” said Melissa Sawyer, global head of the M&A group at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP.
Some significant deals were concluded in the period.
Notable transactions include Adobe (NASDAQ:ADBE) The company’s $20 billion purchase of design software firm Figma along with Oak Street’s take-private deal of $14 billion. deal for the real property investment trust Store Capital (NYSE:STOR) Corp.
In Britain which on September. 26th, the currency fell to a record low against the dollar Schneider Electric (EPA:SCHN)’s 9.5 billion-pound planned acquisition of British software company Aveva was a rare effort to revive the European market’s biggest M&A market.
To view an interactive image Click here:
CURRENCY DISLOCATION
Although valuations are falling, U.S. buyers have been cautious in their position on making deals abroad and placing bets on currency-driven investments amid fears about the conflict in Ukraine as well as Europe’s energy crisis.
“Currency dislocation can create opportunism. But if you’re a U.S. buyer you also need to look at the long-term value creation thesis and right now you won’t get any upside from your target’s sterling earnings which have been weakened by the latest currency fluctuations,” said Dwayne Lysaght, who is the co-head of EMEA M&A at JPMorgan.
Market confidence among companies being positive about dealmaking – believed to be the best indicator of M&A business – dropped since a prolonged recession is approaching.
“You have a whole generation of people who haven’t seen interest rates rise this precipitously and no one really knows where it will stop. That could have a huge impact, not just on valuations, but also on the underlying economy,” said Matthew Abbott, global co-chair of the M&A group at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP.
In the future, dealmakers anticipate more tie-ups in the domestic market, typically through stock, to help companies weather the storm.
“As a reaction to macroeconomic pressures, some large all-stock mergers will be certainly under consideration as a way to gain efficiencies and tackle sluggish top-line growth and inflation in the cost base. The rationale for dealmaking will rely on the ability to take out costs and address operational overlap,” said Derek Shakespeare, chairman of EMEA M&A at Deutsche Bank (ETR:DBKGn).
In the meantime, certain companies may strike deals with hostile boardrooms if they do not want to compromise.
“On the public M&A side, (proactive outreaches) may lead to some more aggressive or hostile activity where buyers don’t take no for an answer and decide to go directly to the shareholders,” said Marc-Anthonyhourihan Global M&A head at UBS.
But deals need to undergo a longer gestation time due to the more scrutiny of antitrust, especially in industries like Big Tech.
Long-running regulatory reviews have forced buyers to pay what they call reverse break-up charges that they’d need to pay in the event of being in a position to not complete the deal.
“Reverse break-up fees are a contractual technique that we’re using to help people overcome their fear of wacky and unpredictable outcomes from the regulators,” said Sawyer of Sullivan & Cromwell.
($1 = 0.9033 pound)
